Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon PRO W7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Radeon PRO W7600
+248%
19990
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
32
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
130W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 33
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL
(215-163000057)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
