Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+23%
5733
Radeon RX 5300
4632
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
22
2816
Shading Units
1408
176
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 14
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
