Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+366%
26730
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
160bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
2816
Shading Units
6144
176
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
130W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD104
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
