Home Comparison Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +1038%
65280

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
2816
Shading Units
12800
176
TMUs
400
64
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD102
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net