Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 370 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2100MHz vs 975MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 370
2496
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+3174%
81720
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
304
1280
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
156.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Trinidad
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Trinidad PRO
(215-0870020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
