Home Comparison Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M360 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 925MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M360
947
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +159%
2458

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
29.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
947.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
TU117
Tropo LE
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net