Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
Arc Pro A30M
+10%
4096
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-128
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
