Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce 610M

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce 610M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
GeForce 610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +2786%
3723
GeForce 610M
129

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2011
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
2
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.344 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.376 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
129.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
10.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
12W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GF108
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net