Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +10%
4101

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
TU116
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net