Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Mobility Radeon X2300
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2007
Crystal System
Generation
M6x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
6.272GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.916 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.916 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
M64
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M64-M
(216PVAVA12FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0
