Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Quadro FX Go540
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX Go540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2004
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
NV43
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0