Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 50.82GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+548%
3723
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
574
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Crystal System
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
50.82GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.784 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.35 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
574.1 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Whistler
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Whistler PRO
(216-0810005)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
