Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+16%
3723
Radeon Pro 5300M
3200
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
20
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
85W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 14
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PROA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
