Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+52%
3723
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2437
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 12
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
