Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX Vega M GL 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1011MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+43%
3723
Radeon RX Vega M GL
2588
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Crystal System
Generation
Vega
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
931 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
20
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.35 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.88 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.588 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.588 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
161.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Polaris 22
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
VegaM XL
(D715A714)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
