Home Comparison Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 5600 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
6390
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +87%
12000
Blender
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
549
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +382%
2649

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Feb 2024
Navi
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1130 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
199.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
12.78 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
6.390 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
399.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
AD107
Navi 10 XE
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net