Home Comparison Radeon RX 5700 XT vs FirePro S9300 X2

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5700 XT +22%
9754
FirePro S9300 X2
7987

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1605 MHz
Base Clock
-
1905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
64
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

121.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
304.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
19.51 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.754 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
609.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 10 XT (215-0917210)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net