Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1905MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5700 XT
+242%
9754
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2849
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Jul 2020
Navi
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1605 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1905 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
304.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
19.51 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
9.754 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
609.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 10 XT
(215-0917210)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
