Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5700 XT
+1944%
9754
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
477
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Jul 2008
Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1605 MHz
Base Clock
-
1905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
304.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
19.51 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.754 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
609.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 10 XT
(215-0917210)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0