Radeon RX 590 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590
+611%
7119
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Polaris
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
7.119 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
445.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 30
GPU Name
RV770
Polaris 30 XT
(215-0922006)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
