Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
696 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 53W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
+1796%
3565
GeForce GT 320 OEM
188
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
72
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
53W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
GT215
Navi 24 XL
(215-135000046)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1