Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (53W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
+647%
3565
GeForce GTX 260
477
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
53W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 24 XL
(215-135000046)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0