Home Comparison Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon X1050 AGP

Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon X1050 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 53W)

Score

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Navi II
Generation
Radeon R300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

53W
TDP
24W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV360
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.06 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
76 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0 (9_0)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net