Radeon RX 6650 XT vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 176W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+799%
10790
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
May 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2055 MHz
Base Clock
-
2635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2190 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.3GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
10
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
168.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
337.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
21.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
674.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
176W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 23
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
