Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6800 XT and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6800 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6800 XT
+8996%
20740
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
228
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Feb 2007
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
72
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
4608
Shading Units
96
288
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
20
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
648.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
41.47 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
1296 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
143W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
G80
Navi 21 XT
(215-121000177)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.5
Shader Model
4.0