Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2310MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 335W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1193%
23650
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1828
Blender
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1588%
3023
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Graphics Card
May 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1860 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
335W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
GM206
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
