Radeon RX 7600 XT vs FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7600 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 7600 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2755MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7600 XT
+937%
22570
FirePro D300
2176
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1980 MHz
Base Clock
-
2755 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
20
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
176.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
352.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
45.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.57 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
705.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 33
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 33 XT
(215-163000047)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
