Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 7900 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2394MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5160 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 XT
+9504%
51480
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Nov 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1387 MHz
Base Clock
-
2394 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
448bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
84
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
5376
Shading Units
216
336
TMUs
72
192
ROPs
28
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
459.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
804.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
103.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
51.48 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
1.609 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
171W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 31 XT
(215-145000156)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0