Radeon RX Vega 64 vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (295W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 64
+58%
12660
FirePro S9300 X2
7987
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Mar 2016
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
64
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
25.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.0
