Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 64
+1688%
12660
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
512bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
25.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0