Radeon X1650 GT vs A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2020
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
84
-
Shading Units
10752
8
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GA102
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6