Radeon X1650 GT vs Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
