Home Comparison Radeon X1650 GT vs CMP 170HX 10 GB

Radeon X1650 GT vs CMP 170HX 10 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 10GB VRAM CMP 170HX 10 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 10 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.56TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.56TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
-
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
10 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GA100
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GA100-105A-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net