Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Cedar
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
