Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Turks
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
