Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro V7900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Cayman
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
