Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G98
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0