Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce 9400 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1 GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G86S
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
