Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G96C
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0