Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce GT 140 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
-
Shading Units
64
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G94B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0