Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce GT 220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
58W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G94
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
