Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
G92B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
