Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GT200B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0