Home Comparison Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce RTX 4010

Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce RTX 4010

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GA107
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net