Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
66
-
Shading Units
8448
8
TMUs
264
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
AD102
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8