Radeon X1650 GT vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
512
8
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
22 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
