Radeon X1650 GT vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GF119
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1