Radeon X1650 GT vs Radeon HD 6250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Cedar
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
