Radeon X1650 GT vs Radeon R5 340X OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Oland
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
