Radeon X1650 GT vs Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
